Bury Taxi Driver’s Licence Revoked, Started Work 2 Days after Visiting Pakistan

A TAXI driver who should have been staying at home but instead went to work less than two days after returning from Pakistan has had his licence revoked.

v
Bury Taxi Driver’s Licence Revoked, Started Work 2 Days after Visiting PakistanBury Taxi Driver’s Licence Revoked, Started Work 2 Days after Visiting Pakistan

The driver, who lives in Bolton, completed 12 taxi rides in less than six hours, then lied to a licensing officer who challenged him, saying he had not been working.

The driver, a father-of-five, who operated in the Bury area, was told he had ‘put the public at risk’ by working so soon after flying back into the country.

He was later contacted by police at his Bolton home and issued with a fixed penalty notice for breaking regulations.

Bury Council’s licensing and safety panel heard that on October 16, 2020, a compliant was made to the deputy licensing officer that the driver had returned from Pakistan on October 13 and had returned to work as a private hire driver when he should be staying home for 14 days due to travel restrictions.

A report to the panel, said: “The officer phoned and asked him whether he was working, he replied

‘no’.

“She asked if he was aware that he should be staying home for 14 days, he replied that he was aware.

“The officer then contacted this client’s operator, who confirmed that the driver had worked on October 15 and provided booking records to show that he completed 12 jobs between 5pm and 10.30pm.

“She called again and asked him why he had just lied when asked whether he had been working.

“He replied that he had a negative test so he could go back to work.

“The officer advised him that a negative test made no difference to the fact that he must be staying home and that as well as obstructing an officer he had also put members of the public at risk.”

After a report was made to the police an officer from GMP Bolton’s unit informed the driver that he would be served with a fixed penalty.

The driver stated at the licensing meeting that it was a misunderstanding on his part when he had told the licensing officer that he was not working as he had thought she had meant at that point in time therefore he had answered no.